Saturday, October 30, 2010

Why the 2010 midterm elections are important

I know this is going to sound like a political statement in favor of Republicans or Democrats, but it is not.  My goal in this posting of Rogue Corner is to explain why these mid-term elections are more critical than any other mid-term since 1990.  At stake is the potential configuration of state legislatures and U.S. Congressional Districts for the next 5 election cycles.  In addition, the usual nature of the U.S. Senate configuration will cause major headaches for both parties in the next three cycles.

As many of you know, every 10 years the U.S. is required by laws to take a census of U.S. citizens to determine the population and where funding should go.  In addition, the Census data is used in many instances to draw Legislative districts in State houses.  But the big key is that as part of the re-drawing of districts, U.S. House of Representatives districts are drawn, and the party that controls the state legislatures in many instances draws the districts in their party’s favor.  This is important in states which add or lose Representatives.  Districts could be drawn to force two congressman from the same party to battle for one spot.  Or new or existing districts could be gerrymandered to guarantee the congress people favors one party.  Don’t believe me?  Check out Maryland’s congressional map, particularly the 2nd and 3rd districts.

There is also Senate ramifications that could spell big trouble for the Democrats in 2012 and 2014 and a huge problem for the Republicans in 2016.  If the Republicans win 8 Senate seats from Democrat control in this cycle (and not NY and WV), the Democrats and their allies will be forced to defend 43 seats in the next 2 elections, compared with a mere 23 for Republicans.  But that also means the Republicans will be forced to defend 26 seats in a Presidential election in 2016, compared with just 8 Democrat seats.  Like I said, it’s headaches for both sides.

What I’m trying to say is no matter your political affiliation, please remember to vote, whether you have already early voted or will vote on Tuesday.  I have no compassion for those who complain about the elections, but refuse to exercise their Constitutional right to vote.

Sunday, October 10, 2010

Why most Yankee fans are/should be Democrats…

Many people know Keith Olbermann as the unabashed and combative liberal host of MSNBC’s Countdown show weeknights at 8 pm/ET.  But what many people may or may not know is that Keith is also one of the New York Yankee’s most visible fans.  Seems like an oxymoron that Olbermann, a person who rails against the rich and says they should be taxed heavily would support the richest team in baseball.  I mean, why doesn’t Keith support the Kansas City Royals or San Diego Padres?  And yet, when you look at the Yankees, why wouldn’t Keith be a Yankee fan and a liberal Democrat.  After all, the Democrats have been good to the Yankees – or at least Democratic Presidents have.  Could the real reason that Keith Olbermann is a liberal Democrat have more to do with Keith’s love of the Yankees than his actual beliefs?  It sounds crazy, but when you look at the statistics, it’s not as crazy as you think.

In the 100+ years of World Series play, the Yankees are baseball’s most successful franchise.  They have won over a quarter of the World Series, and almost 40% of the American League Championships.  But, when you look closer, some interesting statistics related to politics show up:

--Since the World Series came into existence in 1903, there have been 57 World Series played under Republican presidents and 48 under Democratic chief executives.  The Yankee’s winning percentage under Republican presidents is just under 56%.  Under Democrats, their winning percentage goes up to over 58%.  The Yankees have made 23 World Series appearances under Democrats and 17 appearances under Republicans.

--In terms of championships, the Yankees have won 20 World Series under the Dems, but just 7 under the Reps.  Translated that means the Yankees have won over 40% of the titles Team Donkey has controlled the Presidency, but just about 12% of the titles when Team Elephant has ruled.

--The Yankees have won their last 7 World Series Appearances under a Democratic administration (last loss occurred in 1964), but even more interesting is they have won each of the last 4 years of Democratic rule (last 3 years Clinton was in charge and the first year under Obama).  New York has lost their last 5 World Series Appearances under a Republican administration (last title occurred in 1958).

In short, considering 2010 is a year that the Democrats control 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue and that the Yankees are just 8 wins away from Title #28, are we about to see the same end result that we have the last four times this scenario has played out?  Don’t bet against it.

Saturday, October 9, 2010

Having rights v. executing those rights

One of the most emotionally charged issues has finally reached the Supreme Court.  It is the case of Snyder v. Phelps, a case that has forced many to take uncomfortable positions.  And if you think you have figured out what side I’m taking in this fight… well, that’s why I call this blog “Rogue Corner”.

The case of Snyder v. Phelps concerns a protest by the Westboro Baptist Church against a Marine funeral in 2006 in Maryland.  The father of the fallen Marine (Al Snyder) heard about the protest, saw it on tape, then found that the members of the church had posted hate about his son and family on-line.  It was too much.  Snyder sued the church, won a multi-million dollar judgment, only to have the judgment overturned on appeal.  Now, the case has reached the highest court in the land.  At stake:  future definition of the 1st Amendment to the Constitution.

To be fair, I don’t have kind words to say about the Westboro Baptist Church.  This “church”, led by a former civil-rights attorney named Fred Phelps, is at least 2/3 related.  Even folks from Appalachia think this group is largely “in-breds”.  Over the years, they have shown up at funerals from Matthew Shephard to Mr. Rogers to soldiers who died in combat.  They’ve even shown up at Comic Con in San Diego recently.  They have single-handedly brought together political opposites from Keith Olbermann and Bill O’Reilly to Michael Moore and Fox News, who have all tried to use the media to shame this church into changing their tune.  In filing a friend of the Plaintiff’s brief, 48 states’ attorneys (Republicans and Democrats, conservatives and liberals alike) joined together to try and influence the Supreme Court to basically bankrupt this group of bigoted and hypocritical bullies.

So you would think the Supreme Court should vote 9-0 against Fred Phelps and his Jack-booted followers, right?  Not in my eyes.  And apparently not in the eyes of the ACLU, and many national newspapers, from the New York Times to the Wall Street Journal.  We all are arguing the same point:  their language is despicable, and it would be best if they would go away, but they have rights to speak whatever vile they wish.  And, if I am allowed to go further, Al Snyder did go looking for Westboro blogs about what they had to say about him and his family.  That was a mistake, and I think it’s this will ultimately cost Al Snyder at the Supreme Court.  (Side note:  me siding with the ACLU on a freedom of speech issue?  You’d think my name was John Parks Brown!)

Look, saying to someone “God hates you” or “God is angry with you” stings people (and nobody knows that better than me how it feels).  But at the same time, if we had a right to sue for people saying vile things about us, former President George W. Bush would supplant Carlos Slim as the richest man on earth.  It shouldn’t be a reason to start down a dark path where freedom of speech could be compromised.  We already had a stupid court decision in the last ten years with the Kelo case and eminent domain.  Ruling against Westboro would be a bigger mistake, and I think the court should rule in the Phelps favor, although they’ll probably hold their noses in doing so.  Remember, the Supreme Court has allowed Nazis to march through the Jewish Chicago suburb of Skokie, IL in the past.

That doesn’t mean we should tolerate this church in our communities.  The Comic Con folks had a great approach:  dish it back and mock these protesters.  Maybe one day this church will get the message:  just because you have the right to protest doesn’t mean you should execute that right often.

Wednesday, September 22, 2010

Slots at Arundel Mills… Can I tell both sides to piss off?

In this political season where we are seeing what is a growing tidal wave of anti-incumbent fever, one issue has boiled my blood.  It’s an issue that has been years in the making, has seen incompetence from politicians and horse racing owners, greed from entertainment moguls, stupidity from people assuming that the politicians and entertainment moguls would do the right thing, a court system attempting to bypass a recall system, and a campaign that has come up with misleading one-line slogans, such as “Jobs and Revenue” and “Safer streets”.  I am talking about the vote to Build a Slots Parlor at Arundel Mills Mall, which has been allowed via the Maryland Constitution.  And both sides need to be taken to task.

To summarize how we got to this stupid point, let’s review the history…  In 2007, after years of trying to legalize slots to help the sagging horse racing industry, the Maryland legislature decided that they didn’t want the responsibility to try and pass slots (mainly because Maryland Speaker Michael Busch wouldn’t bring slots up for a vote), so they put the decision in the hands of voters via a Constitutional Amendment.  The Amendment mandated specific locations for the slots to be placed:  Cecil County, Western Maryland Mountains, near Ocean City, Baltimore City, and Anne Arundel County.  And to ensure passage by voters, the legislature tied school funding, union concessions, and police and fire money to the slots, which was initially designed to save horse racing.  Naturally, it passed with about 60%.

With the amendment passed, bids were opened in 2009.  The Maryland Legislature hoped for a windfall just on the bidding process.  Unfortunately, due to the economy and the fact that other nearby states already had slots and were pushing table games, the bidding process was a disaster.  In Anne Arundel County, it was assumed that Laurel Racetrack would be the winner.  However, the owners of Laurel did not place their bid in time nor did they meet the minimum bid.

Enter Frank Cordish, entertainment mogul with an idea:  build a slots parlor near the popular Arundel Mills Mall.  Cordish put forward a proposal that was on time and met the requirements of the bidding process.  Naturally, the bid from the Cordish group was selected and the Anne Arundel County Council voted to support the Cordish bid.

That’s when residents near Arundel Mills Mall got involved.  They obviously hated the idea of a gambling place near their Single Family Home neighborhoods, and, with the help of the Horse Racing Industry, organized a petition to force the Slots Proposal on the ballot.  They got well over the necessary signatures.  Cordish sued claiming (1) most of the signatures were fake and (2) the petition process was illegal to begin with.  Cordish won the legal case at the County level, but the Maryland Supreme Court reversed the lower court ruling, forcing the ballot question.

The campaign has been a mess.  The slots opponents maintained their simple message:  no slots at the Mall, and put the slots at Laurel Racetrack.  The Cordish group has kept it to simple one-liners:  Jobs and Revenue, Safer Streets, Lower Taxes, and Better Schools.  The supporters have even had the chutzpah to place giant signs at Arundel Mills telling people it’s about Jobs and Revenue.  I’m sure residents fume at seeing those signs on a daily basis.

So why am I pissed at both sides?  Simple.  To slots opponents at Arundel Mills, many of them voted in 2008 to legalize slots.  Now they’re upset that Cordish is within the constitutional right to put slots in their neighborhood?  Sorry, hypocrites, but you voted to allow the possibility in the first place.  If slots pass, you’ll just have to deal with it.

As for Cordish, you’re one-liners are full of misinterpretations.  Slots at the Mall will NOT lower taxes or provide safer streets.  It could bring in a criminal element (like it has done in the past).  Better schools is just a pipe dream in a state that already has some of the nation’s best public schools.  And your key point of Providing Jobs and Revenue?  Legalizing prostitution would provide Jobs and Revenue, but you don’t see Marylanders voting for that (oh wait, we already have legalized prostitution in Maryland… it’s called ANNAPOLIS LOBBYISTS!!!)

The games that have been played over the slots issue has been an embarrassment and I have had enough.  Can we eliminate the biggest reason for slots and just put the Preakness up for sale to the highest out-of-state bidder yet?

Tuesday, September 21, 2010

AT&T caught in 4G crossfire…

This may be one of the few times to feel bad for the Telecom giant AT&T.  Sure, AT&T is a juggernaut in the telecommunication world, particularly with regards to wireless and cable.  AT&T is the sole provider of the iPhone and iPad in the US, two devices that are must haves.  Also, AT&T has the largest network in America in terms of coverage.  And AT&T’s U-Verse is a very formidable cable standard that is gaining in popularity.

But AT&T’s cellular market has taken a hit in recent years as the giant has struggled to provide 3G speeds, particularly in urban areas where iPhone usage has strained the network.  And now, AT&T seems to be lagging in a growing 3-way battle for pre-4G supremacy.  AT&T’s attempts to split the difference may provide turbulence over the next 4 years.

In one corner is Sprint and Clear, who started the 4G war by launching WiMAX 2 years ago in Baltimore.  Though the network stopped and started over the last two years, it now has a good base of customers and devices.  WiMAX may ultimately not survive, but it will be a force at least for the next 1-2 years.

The second corner is occupied by T-Mobile.  T-Mobile has all but officially supplanted AT&T as the fastest 3G network as their HSPA+ network has rapidly spread across the nation.  While AT&T is still modernizing their networks, T-Mobile has put in advanced infrastructure making upgrades to HSPA+ faster via software only, providing speeds that match and, in some cases, exceed WiMAX.  HSPA+ is a cheap alternative to WiMAX and LTE technology, as T-Mobile waits for the arrival of true 4G technologies.

The third corner is occupied by Verizon Wireless and MetroPCS.  MetroPCS has just launched LTE with Verizon following suit later this year.  Both had to go with LTE, considering that their technology was not keeping up with AT&T’s speeds.  Upgrading to LTE surpasses AT&T’s current network speed.

So what is AT&T’s plan?  Right now, AT&T is trying to upgrade to HSPA+ in some areas and LTE in others over the next two years.  In addition, AT&T will probably push Femtocells to help saturate coverage and close the speed gap.  Over the next couple of years, AT&T will likely be playing catch-up with more nimble competitors.  Don’t plan AT&T’s funeral yet, though.  AT&T has the resources to be the likely forerunner of true 4G when it arrives in 2013 or 2014.

For now, Apple is AT&T’s best friend.  As long as the iPhone and iPad maintain their status and are exclusive to AT&T, AT&T is fine.

Sunday, September 19, 2010

Coming home

In an earlier blog, I wondered what it would be like to return home to Snellville after being away for almost 5 years.  This past week, I got my answer as my wife, my son, and I returned to the place “Where Everybody’s Somebody”.

In short, the town has changed considerably.  Gone is the Hardee’s and Dairy Queen on West Main Street, and if A&J is still there, I didn’t see it.  McDonald’s and KFC are still in their traditional location, though they have been significantly upgraded.  The New Snellville City Hall is huge and South Gwinnett High School looks like they are adding a skyscraper to the facility.  There are new facilities everywhere.  Most notably the Avenue at Web Gin House has added new shopping areas.  Some old landmarks, though still in original locations are older and more worn down.  And there is a lot of vacant buildings in town.  Heck, the Avenue at Web Gin House is less than four years old, and some shops have already left.  Can we at least tear down some buildings if they are going to remain vacant for years?

It’s clear, however, that even with the new facilities, the town has aged and grown.  What used to be an exburb is now “the Atlanta suburb”.  Memorial Drive didn’t die, it just moved out to Snellville.  The demographics has changed as families have moved on after raising their kids, and I predict an African-American could become mayor of Snellville in 15 years… remarkable considering it was less than 20 years ago when the town was over 90% white.  Even the neighborhood is showing it’s signs of age.  Water lines approaching the age of 40 have already busted.  The neighborhood has tried to go younger, but at least 5 families have been in the neighborhood longer than the 31 years that my parents have lived in the house.

It was good to see old friends in town, though.  Perhaps I will have a chance to visit Snellville again at some point in the future with Liz and Joshua and talk about how the town has changed even more.

Friday, September 3, 2010

Random thoughts (a la Norman Chad)

From time to time, Norman Chad likes to make random statements in the newspaper.  I think I’m going to designate this week to make some random observations right now.  So, here are 23 random thoughts:

1.  The Weather Channel really roots for major hurricanes to develop.  Over the last several years, they got excited when a Tropical Storm formed.  Now, they get excited every time a Tropical Depression develops even if it doesn’t hit the US.  Thankfully, Earl has arrived to roll Cantore out.

2.  David Letterman is still the creepiest guy in the public eye.  I give him five years before he is charged with having inappropriate contact with a minor.

3.  In 2006, the country wanted change, and the Democrats cheered.  In 2008, the country wanted change, and the Democrats cheered.  In 2010, the country wants change, and the Democrats are screaming, Hey, wait a minute!

4.  Maybe the real reason for the possible upcoming NFL lockout in 2011 is so they can guarantee Brett Favre will retire after this season.

5. When the VP choices in 2008 were Sarah Palin and Joe Biden, Dan Quayle had to be jumping for joy.  He realized he would not go down as the most incompetent VP in history.

6.  One reason that the Ravens are a class organization:  after a pre-season game when a second-string LB showboated on a INT return for a TD, John Harbaugh found the guy and chewed him out.  They are everything in class that the Bengals are not.

7.  I keep hearing about this Big Game coming to National TV hosted by PokerStars.net.  Question is:  What channel and when?

8.  OK, we all want green energy, but we’re not willing to use the green energy that will provide the most energy?  Even former Greenpeace founders think nuclear is an option to be considered.

9.  While we’re on the subject of green energy, how about a smartphone that runs on solar power?  Heck, if we can get Calculators to run on Solar, surely we can do the same with an iPhone!

10.  Alternate sports jerseys have reached an epidemic.  The Arizona Cardinals have an alternate Black jersey?  Officially, the worst alternate home jersey is the Lime Green Seattle Seahawks jersey.

11.  I though Gulf Gas Stations disappeared when BP took over all the Georgia stations 20 years ago.  Now Gulf is taking over all the former Chevron and Texaco stations in Maryland.  Huh?

12.  Something tells me the Palins and Murkowskis will not be having dinner together or exchanging Christmas cards anytime soon. 

13.  Sports Illustrated did an article back in 1989 on how power pitchers pitching too many innings early in their career would shorten their careers.  One of the power pitchers mentioned in the article was Roger Clemens, and by the way, he was the only guy to have a career for over 20 seasons.  Anybody want to take a stab at how he REALLY did it?

14.  I want to see a BCS school get denied by Boise State and TCU from playing in the National Title Game.  The BCS conferences would institute a playoff immediately next season.

15.  I think Oklahoma should be banned from College Football National Title Game Consideration until (a) they win all their regular season game, including the Big 12 Title Game, and (b) have no more than 1 other CFB team that is undefeated.  Three times this past decade, they got into a title game they didn’t deserve and didn’t bother to show up.

16.  Why we are on the subject of College Football Teams that should be forced to earn their way to a National Title Game… Exhibit B:  Ohio State.  Sorry, Kirk.  Hope you enjoy this season Buckeye fans, because thanks to incoming Nebraska, it will be your last chance at the National Title for a while.

17.  Best reason to ban the 3D Movie/TV Experience:  Jackass 3D is coming.

18.  I’ll say it once and I’ll say it again:  Today’s young Disney stars become tomorrow’s Tabloid Stars.  Thank you for playing, Miley Cyrus.  Up next:  Demi Lovato.

19.  Is the future of Radio on iTunes?  Since I got iTunes on my Computer, I’ve noticed I can access thousands of stations.

20.  Giving your own money and resources to others or charity is showing compassion.  Taking other people’s money and resources and giving to others is not.

21.  When it comes to people celebrating any political bills being passed without anyone reading the full bill, I am always reminded of a quote from Centauri Ambassador Londo Mollari of Babylon 5:  “You do not understand.  But you will.”

22.  I’ve decided to lower the size limit of campaign signs when I become campaign sign czar.  We will now fine any campaign $1 for every square inch over 400 square inches that any sign exceeds.  Double the fine in heavily traffic’d areas (we shouldn’t be forced to look at those giant signs while stuck in traffic) and double the fine for incumbents (if you have to produce a giant sign to tell us to vote for you, you have made no impact).

23.  I’d like to know how a Maryland driver was able to get “ASS” on their license plate.  Granted, the full license plate was “NENNASS”, but still…