Wednesday, November 16, 2011

Predicting Penn State’s fate using the past…

The Penn State University scandal is dominating the Sports World as many people have weighed in.  So far, the scandal has forced the firing of the University President, a legendary Football Coach, the school AD and a VP.  And none of them are involved in the worst of the accusations, which involves a former Assistant Football Coach who was once rumored to be the heir apparent to Joe Paterno.  Jerry Sandusky’s mysterious departure in 1999 now appears to be related to allegations of child molestation, and attempts to hide the situation only made it worse when more allegations of child abuse surfaced after Sandusky left but the program, but was still associated with the program.

Joe Paterno’s firing was consistent with past scandals.  Even when a scandal ultimately turned out to be nothing (as in the case of the Duke Lacrosse team in 2006), the head coach is usually fired in the process.  But this scandal is far worse than the scandals of the past 25 years.  In fact the only scandal that seems to come close in terms of disgust was the Baylor Basketball scandal of 2003, where one player murdered another and the head coach tried to cover up the murder by pinning drugs on the victim.  In the end, the Baylor basketball team was dealt a severe blow for many years, and only the Drew family of Valparaiso, Indiana could restore Baylor to National prominence.

Another far lesser scandal led to the near termination of a Football Power.  In the 1980s, SMU’s team was delivered a severe blow as allegations of repeated paying of football players left the NCAA no choice but to issue a termination of the program for at least a year.  The “death penalty” left the SMU program is such disarray that SMU has not been competitive since.  The NCAA, as a result, has been hesitant to issue another death penalty to any other school since.

A friend of mine, John Brown, suggested that Penn State’s football program should be terminated.  While extreme, the move would not be without precedence.  In the late 1930s, the University of Chicago decided to terminate its football program to prevent the program from descending into the levels that other fellow Big Ten programs and other School had at the time to win National Titles.  It would be nearly 30 years before the University of Chicago would field another Varsity Football Team, and now it operates at the much lower Division III level, never to compete at the National levels it once had.

Still, the NCAA has a chance to do the right thing here.  If the allegations against Jerry Sandusky are proven true, then Penn State is guilty of lack of institutional control, a major violation that should be grounds for the death penalty—if the NCAA had the courage to execute it again.  This may be the best hope for anyone looking for justice in this scandal.  A year or two away from college football may risk Penn State being non-competitive for 30 years, but in the long run, it may be a chance to prove that no school is bigger than the NCAA, and, in the process, it may begin to restore some integrity to college football.

What is needed now is a Kennesaw Landis type of personality to come down hard on Penn State and force the big school into potential reforms to prevent this kind of scandal (or anything else close to it) from ever happening again.  But will we ever see that happen?  We can only hope.

Sunday, November 6, 2011

Recap of 4G World

For the last 5 years, I have had the honor of attending one of the most important conferences in the Wireless Communications Industry.  This conference has focused on the present and future of the Wireless Industry, presented by the Yankee Group of Boston.  In 2007 and 2008, the conference was known as WiMAX World, as the conference focused on the future of Computer communications.  WiMAX at that time appeared to have major backing among startups and some incumbants like Sprint.  In 2009, the Conference changed it’s name to 4G World, recognizing the importance of LTE and HSPA+ in the world of communications.  And since that time, the growth of LTE has made the most die-hard WiMAX providers plan to switch over to LTE.

At this year’s conference, WiMAX was not talked about much.  It is clear that LTE has won the ‘4G’ Wars.  The discussions rather focused on how to address the problem of capacity in networks.  It is clear that smartphones, led by the iPhone have been successful—too successful.  The fact that people are using their phones for more than just phone calls and texting has become apparent in the rise of mobile data being used for things such as Web browsing, Social Media, and Streaming video.  In fact, making a phone call on a mobile phone has become only the 4th most used application of a phone.

But this use of Mobile Data on Smartphones has led to a problem.  The networks are being strained.  Already, mobile data offloading to unsecure WiFi mesh networks are occurring in places such as New York and San Francisco.  And the problem is getting worse.  Within 2 years, it is expected that we will have the first smartphone meltdown.  This meltdown will make the Blackberry’s issues last month look like a Sunday picnic.

So, what are Mobile companies planning to do about it?  Aside from data throttling where they could restrict users to a hard cap of data usage, the options are few and not guaranteed to work.  The big idea involves creating heterogeneous networks (or HetNets), where a large macro-cell will be supplemented in its coverage areas by smaller metro-cell (including lightRadio Cubes in neighborhoods and femtocells in homes and businesses).  These smaller cells will increase the capacity of cell coverage areas, while not interfering with the larger macro-cell.  To ensure these smaller metro-cells are connected to the network, backhaul will need to be provided.  The backhaul will either be fiber or microwave in nature.

Obviously, unlimited data plans are also being scrapped.  Contrary to what Sprint says, they announced at the conference that they were eliminating unlimited mobile data in their dongels and hot spots.  They are trying to maintain unlimited data in their phones, but the writing is on the wall that unlimited data will soon end on their phones, particularly as the iPhone makes it’s appearance on the Sprint network.

Speaking of Sprint, in early October they announced that they were going to develop their LTE network at the expense of terminating their Nextel customers and ultimately ending their selling of WiMAX gear.  They also hinted they would end their relationship with Clearwire and be willing to let Clearwire go bankrupt.  At the conference, however, they suggested that they would maintain their relationship with Clearwire’s WiMAX network for as long as possible.  Very few people believed that statement, however, leading to speculation that Verizon or AT&T maybe interested in purchasing some of Clearwire’s valuable spectrum, openly in front of Sprint’s executives.

This conference was a great showcase of what is to come and the dangers that the wireless networks face.  The coming years will show how wireless companies can handle the oncoming Mobile data storm.