This has been a spring of significant tornado activity. As it stands right now, this year has seen a rash of tornadoes hit small cities and large. Raleigh, NC. St. Louis, MO. Tuscaloosa, AL. Birmingham, AL. Minneapolis, MN. Dallas, TX. Oklahoma City, OK. We suffered a new Super Outbreak of Tornadoes that appears to surpass the 1974 Super Outbreak in terms of tornadoes and fatalities. The death toll for this year has surpassed any year since official death toll stats started being kept in 1950. And yet, as bad as Tuscaloosa got hammered last month, the tornado in Joplin may have been even more of a dagger to the heart.
The Weather Channel was following Tornadoes as part of their “Great Tornado Hunt” programs. Their goal was to study tornadoes in the hopes of unlocking new clues to predicting tornadoes and saving lives. To be fair, the newer HD Doppler radars have helped and new forecasting techniques have saved lives. Having looked at Tuscaloosa, although 1000 people were injured, it was a minor miracle only 42 died there.
As it turned out, when the tornado hit Joplin, Mike Bettes and his Weather Channel crew were in the vicinity. Initially, the tornado damage saw was bad. Then they began to realize that the further into the town they went, the damage was worse. By the time they reached the hospital, they realized how destructive the tornado was. It didn’t take much close-ups of the damage for a casual weather fan to realize Joplin was in deep trouble. One term instantly popped into my head: EF-5. Mike Bettes’ breakdown on TV confirmed this tornado had produced horrific damage. One of the worst parts was that the High School had just completed Graduation exercises. At least 3 or 4 students died just moments after celebrating their greatest accomplishment of their young lives.
You would think that a single tornado would not produce over a 100 fatalities anymore. Then again, I used to think we would never see another hurricane that would cause 1000+ US fatalities until Katrina hit. It’s hard to believe that after how far we have come to try and save lives and that we now live in an age where you can informed 15 different ways, that so many people could die in a weather event.
So, how do we prevent more people from dying in the future? We tell people all the right things of what to do, and yet, people still die. To be honest, it is eating away at weather people what has happened this spring in terms of fatalities, even with all of the advanced warning. Short of trying to make tornadoes not form in the first place (if people can), weather people have done all they can to prevent a significant loss of life. The solutions now aren’t easy or cheap. How much are you willing to pay to ensure you can survive nature’s wrath?
One thing I am glad I haven’t yet heard: the attempt by many “smart people” at attempting to connect the tornado damage and deaths to the cc words. I know it’s coming, though. But, to their credit, neither the weather channel or the New York Times or Washington Post or any other media outlet is doing it—yet. They aren’t willing to stick their neck out that far.
I hope the weather we have seen will provide clues to help prevent the next major disaster. Until then, when the weather turns bad, keep an eye and ear alert for warnings.